Bug 305031

Summary:	Please stabilize sci-electronics/gwave-20090213-r1
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Denis Dupeyron (RETIRED) <calchan>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	The Soldering-Iron Brotherhood <sci-electronics>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	Keywords:	STABLEREQ
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	314167, 317159
Bug Blocks:	248351

Description Denis Dupeyron (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-02-14 07:09:17 UTC

Please arches stabilize sci-electronics/gwave-20090213. Doing so would be a good action as it would allow to get rid of one of the very last ebuilds depending on gtk+-1.

How to test:
Download http://dev.gentoo.org/~calchan/tran.out.bz2 and unpack it
Start gwave, then open the above file with File -> Read file
A small window with 3 signals will appear
Do View -> Add panel
Drag and drop each of the 3 signals in one of the 3 panels
Zoom in and out and you're done.

Thanks,
Denis.

Comment 1 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev

2010-02-15 16:49:19 UTC

gwave depends on dev-scheme/guile-gnome-platform-2.16*, which by itself depends on dev-scheme/guile-cairo. But there is no stable ebuild of guile-cairo in the tree.

Comment 2 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev

2010-03-06 19:08:39 UTC

Besides the problem in comment #1 I did test the ebuidl in stable amd64 chroot.

Tested:
Compiled with all combinations of USE flags.
Run tests as suggested.
Cehcked also most of the menu actions (dropdown and popup).

Works without any problems so far.

Comment 3 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-05-17 18:35:54 UTC

x86 stable

Comment 4 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev

2010-05-30 15:19:28 UTC

gwave-20090213 fails with forced --as-needed as told in bug 248351 here on stable amd64 chroot. Fixed in -r1.

+*gwave-20090213-r1 (30 May 2010)
+
+  30 May 2010; Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org>
+  +gwave-20090213-r1.ebuild, +files/gwave-20090213-as-needed.patch:
+  Fix for bug #248351

Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-06-18 18:28:29 UTC

Should we stable -r1 instead then?

Comment 6 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev

2010-06-18 19:43:20 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Should we stable -r1 instead then?
> 

Would be a good idea. Only the 30 days are not over yet.

Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2010-06-24 13:12:51 UTC

OK :-) (I don't think we need to wait all 30 days only for an as-needed fix)

Comment 8 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-06-24 17:41:52 UTC

amd64 stable

Comment 9 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev

2010-07-05 16:43:51 UTC

Readding x86.

Bug 248351 applies also to x86 arch. Got fixed in -r1 after you stabled -r0. So please stable the -r1 version too. Thanks.

Comment 10 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-07-07 14:25:54 UTC

x86 stable

Comment 11 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-11-01 23:45:00 UTC

ppc64 doesn't have this package keyworded at all.

Comment 12 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev

2011-04-30 06:09:58 UTC

Reopening. Seems ppc got forgotten in the first run. So please stabilize.

Comment 13 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2011-06-28 20:24:51 UTC

ppc done; closing as last arch