Summary: | blas-19940131-r1.ebuild (Update) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Derek Dolney <z23> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci> |
Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | z23 |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 30454 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
blas-19940131-r1.ebuild
Makefile f77-reference |
Description
Derek Dolney
2003-10-05 20:37:02 UTC
Created attachment 18840 [details]
blas-19940131-r1.ebuild
Created attachment 18841 [details]
Makefile
Created attachment 18842 [details] f77-reference Profile for blas-config (see bug 30454) In portage, please test. Will stay package-masked until all blas related changes are ready. George As per our discussion on how to name packages I moved blas-19940131 to blas-reference-19940131. I had to adjust SRC_URI (it used $PN) but that was the only adjustment. It installs the same way, so no other modifications seem to be necessary to make it work with blas-config, still I would appreciate a quick test ;). I adjusted package.mask correspondingly as well.. George I've tested the new ebuild in portage with and without ifc use. It works both ways.
George wrote:
> it is nice to be able to run multiple install's after just one compile.
Good point. Am I mistaken in that we should not declare RPATH inside src_compile() since it is also used in src_install()?
|