Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 30462

Summary: blas-19940131-r1.ebuild (Update)
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Derek Dolney <z23>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci>
Status: RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST    
Severity: enhancement CC: z23
Priority: High Keywords: EBUILD
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on: 30454    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments: blas-19940131-r1.ebuild
Makefile
f77-reference

Description Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:37:02 UTC
This ebuild will build a BLAS shared library from the netlib reference
implementation. Please see comments in bug 30453.

It depends on the blas-config tool submitted as bug 30454.

I don't know why the current app-sci/blas ebuild is versioned as 19980702. There
is no indication of this date on the webpage or in the code. The code suggests
the last modification occurred on 1/31/1994.

I've tested building with and without USE="ifc". Either way, I can link to the resulting libraries with g77 or ifc.
Comment 1 Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:37:41 UTC
Created attachment 18840 [details]
blas-19940131-r1.ebuild
Comment 2 Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38:02 UTC
Created attachment 18841 [details]
Makefile
Comment 3 Derek Dolney 2003-10-05 20:38:37 UTC
Created attachment 18842 [details]
f77-reference

Profile for blas-config (see bug 30454)
Comment 4 George Shapovalov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-10-28 17:53:35 UTC
In portage, please test.

Will stay package-masked until all blas related changes are ready.

George
Comment 5 George Shapovalov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-02-01 19:22:01 UTC
As per our discussion on how to name packages I moved blas-19940131 to blas-reference-19940131. I had to adjust SRC_URI (it used $PN) but that was the only adjustment. It installs the same way, so no other modifications seem to be necessary to make it work with blas-config, still I would appreciate a quick test ;).
I adjusted package.mask correspondingly as well..

George
Comment 6 Derek Dolney 2004-02-04 10:41:30 UTC
I've tested the new ebuild in portage with and without ifc use. It works both ways.

George wrote:
> it is nice to be able to run multiple install's after just one compile.

Good point. Am I mistaken in that we should not declare RPATH inside src_compile() since it is also used in src_install()?