|Summary:||Please stabilize app-emulation/dosemu-1.4.1_pre20091009|
|Product:||Gentoo Linux||Reporter:||Hanno Böck <hanno>|
|Component:||Current packages||Assignee:||Hanno Böck <hanno>|
|Package list:||Runtime testing required:||---|
|Bug Depends on:|
|Bug Blocks:||302468, 323389|
Description Hanno Böck 2010-01-17 23:10:57 UTC
Current stable (1.4.0) doesn't even build with latest gcc and bugs are popping up that are most likely fixed in this snapshot, please stabilize.
Comment 1 Andreas Schürch 2010-01-18 19:42:10 UTC
It passed all tests successful here on x86.
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2010-01-19 15:31:57 UTC
stable x86, thanks Andreas
Comment 3 Konstantin Münning 2010-02-05 11:10:56 UTC
(In reply to comment #2) > stable x86, thanks Andreas > Sorry, this is too early. When Borland Pascal ist run app-emulation/dosemu-1.4.1_pre20091009 exits with ERROR: general protection at 0x69740: 0 and when Borland C is run the error is ERROR: general protection at 0x8132: 29 I Would't say that's stable. (app-emulation/dosemu-126.96.36.199 works fine)
Comment 4 Hanno Böck 2010-02-13 17:46:53 UTC
Konstantin, can you open a separate bug for your issue? Is any of your failing apps available for download anywhere? Tried with turbo pascal 7 and that seems to work. What versions of Borland Pascal/C are failing for you?
Comment 5 Pacho Ramos 2010-05-22 09:11:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > stable x86, thanks Andreas > > > > Sorry, this is too early. When Borland Pascal ist run > app-emulation/dosemu-1.4.1_pre20091009 exits with > > ERROR: general protection at 0x69740: 0 > > and when Borland C is run the error is > > ERROR: general protection at 0x8132: 29 > > I Would't say that's stable. (app-emulation/dosemu-188.8.131.52 works fine) > Did you report this?
Comment 6 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2010-05-27 15:52:40 UTC
Should we proceed with that anyway?
Comment 7 Hanno Böck 2010-05-27 16:08:38 UTC
Yes, as we don't have any further info and no way to reproduce this bug, please go ahead. Konstantin, if this bug still persists, please open a separate bug report and provide some more detailed information.
Comment 8 Samuli Suominen 2010-06-10 09:34:54 UTC
This is also required for GCC 4.4 and fortify sources, level 2, so blocks 302468.
Comment 9 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) 2010-06-24 08:59:07 UTC
amd64 stable, closing