Bug 301294

Summary:	dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2009 fails with dev-tex/luatex-0.50
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Alexis Ballier <aballier>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID
Severity:	normal	CC:	martin, tex
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Nico Schlömer 2010-01-17 17:19:21 UTC

Hi,

this is going to be a really sloppy bug report, sorry. :)

Just notice that that dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2009 doesn't compile against dev-tex/luatex-0.50.

Problem solved by downgrading dev-tex/luatex-0.47.0. I guess there should be a "<="-dependecy then.

Cheers,
Nico

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Martin Väth 2010-01-17 18:10:49 UTC

I can *not* confirm this: I just upgraded three x86 and one amd64 systems
from stable tex-packages to texlive-2009 (and the required ~ARCH dependencies):
Everything went smoothly. Just for the records:
The order of updates was in all cases the same:

poppler-*-0.12.1 (except poppler-qt4-0.12.1)
xpdf-3.0.2-r4
poppler-qt4-0.12.1
texlive-core-2009
[then manually stopping and running etc-update just to be sure...]
texlive-documentation-base-2009
luatex-0.50.0
texlive-documentation-*-2009
texlive-basic-2009
...other texlive stuff...
xdvik and some other stuff shown by revdep-rebuild

In particular, texlive-base-2009 was built *after* luatex-0.50.0 without
problems.

Comment 2 Nico Schlömer 2010-01-17 21:38:36 UTC

Well, I guess that was a nasty dependency problem with poppler.
E.g., app-text/texlive itself tries to pull in

=dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7
=app-text/poppler-utils-0.10.7

where as luatex I think forces a larger version number.

Comment 3 Nico Schlömer 2010-01-18 07:47:53 UTC

Gah, figured it out. The problem were some masked virtual/poppler-* packages, while the corresponding dev-libs/poppler-* were already unmasked.

Closing as invalid.