Summary: | please stabilize =mail-filter/spamassassin-3.2.5-r2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Benny Pedersen <me> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Perl team <perl> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | binki, bug, darkside, luckyluke |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 288161 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Benny Pedersen
2010-01-15 18:51:14 UTC
for a STABLEREQ for mail-filter/spamassassin-3.2.5 it needs no outstanding bugs, I found one bug # 288161 Just turn a bug like this into a STABLEREQ then next time because that is basically the request :) Add arches once bug 288161 is resolved (unless there are any other showstoppers) Keywords: spamassassin-3.2.1-r2: alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 Keywords: spamassassin-3.2.5-r2: ~alpha ~amd64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 Arches, please test and mark mail-filter/spamassassin-3.2.5-r2 stable. ppc stable Yet another sandbox vs me issue... :-( It passes the testsuite on x86 as long as i have FEATURES="test collision--protect -sandbox" With the sandbox enabled, i hit http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=294576 It has something to do with relative paths within t/SATest.pm on line 84 and 85! If i move them around, i can pass different tests manually within the sandbox! But they have to be different (once a ./path works, while on another test it fails with it and needs to be /the/full/path or just path without anything leading) for at least 3 different tests! :-/ But i don't think its a regression, as the current stable ebuild (3.2.1-r2) contains #SRC_TEST="do". ;-) stable x86 nonetheless, thanks Andreas. stable on ppc64 alpha/ia64/sparc stable FYI, it's working stable on hppa (production MX, checks some hundred mails a day with spikes of thousands/day), but I hadn't tested for bug #288161 Stable for HPPA. Should we proceed even with bug 288161 ? (if yes, please drop the blocker) Maybe tests should be restricted until they work with sandbox enabled (bug 294576) (In reply to comment #12) > Maybe tests should be restricted until they work with sandbox enabled (bug > 294576) > SRC_TEST="skip" should work amd64 stable |