Summary: | sys-devel/binutils fails neon tests on arm | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Dustin Polke <DuPol> |
Component: | [OLD] Unspecified | Assignee: | Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | siarhei.siamashka |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | TESTFAILURE |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
build.log
gas.log binutils-2.20.1 - gas.log |
Description
Dustin Polke
2010-01-12 14:12:51 UTC
Created attachment 216262 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 216263 [details]
gas.log
if binutils-2.20.1+ pass, then i'm not inclined to backport a fix for it ... (In reply to comment #3) > if binutils-2.20.1+ pass, then i'm not inclined to backport a fix for it ... > I tested binutils-2.20-r1 which is the newest version keyworded ~arm. It fails the same way. (In reply to comment #4) > I tested binutils-2.20-r1 I think you have to wait for vapier to commit an ebuild for binutils-2.20.1 to portage. The 2.20.1 was mostly delayed because of some arm-patching, and as he said: if it fixes your problems, he does not feel like he wants to backport those patches. So the question here is mostly when it will hit the tree so you can test it. (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I tested binutils-2.20-r1 > > I think you have to wait for vapier to commit an ebuild for binutils-2.20.1 to > portage. Now when he has, will you try with that? (In reply to comment #3) > if binutils-2.20.1+ pass, then i'm not inclined to backport a fix for it ... > binutils-2.20.1 fails as well: Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for target. Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target. Using /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/binutils-2.20.1/gas/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/binutils-2.20.1/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp ... Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/binutils-2.20.1/gas/testsuite/gas/alpha/alpha.exp ... Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/binutils-2.20.1/gas/testsuite/gas/arc/arc.exp ... Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/binutils-2.20.1/gas/testsuite/gas/arc/warn.exp ... Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-2.20.1/work/binutils-2.20.1/gas/testsuite/gas/arm/arm.exp ... FAIL: Neon instruction coverage [...] === gas Summary === # of expected passes 336 # of unexpected failures 1 # of unsupported tests 4 ../as-new 2.20.1.20100303 Created attachment 222645 [details]
binutils-2.20.1 - gas.log
Any news on this? I tested all stable versions on arm and they all fail in the same way. Thus, adjusting summary. no one is interested in working on it. feel free to do so. |