Summary: | app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20091231 collides with emul-linux-x86-sdl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) <cardoe> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | AMD64 Project <amd64> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | pacho |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 165270 |
Description
Doug Goldstein (RETIRED)
![]() I didn't expect this will occur since emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20091231.ebuild RDEPENDs on ~app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-sdl-${PV} :-/, but now I have remembered that maybe this occurs because emul-linux-x86-sdl-20091231.ebuild also RDEPENDs on ~app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-${PV}" :-( (this is inherited from older emul packages) The problem is that, in this situations, I don't know how portage chooses the order For now, probably, app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs-20091231 could block <=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-sdl-20081109 , but I will need to try to make app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-medialibs stop depending on app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-sdl for the next round Do you have any better alternative? (since you have much more experience than me on this :-)) Thanks Fix just comitted Thanks a lot for reporting, please report every problem you find :-) Regards |