| Summary: | libdrm should follow VIDEO_CARDS for drm libs compiled | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Aelia <diego.abelenda> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | ansla80, jer |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 296482 | ||
| Attachments: | patch to libdrm-2.4.15 that allow to set the drm modules compiled with VIDEO_CARDS | ||
|
Description
Aelia
2009-11-30 16:33:18 UTC
Created attachment 211600 [details, diff]
patch to libdrm-2.4.15 that allow to set the drm modules compiled with VIDEO_CARDS
Simply changing libdrm is not enough. Also the reverse dependencies such as mesa and xf86-video-* have to be adjusted if one wants to follow this path. the change for mesa is only to check if the video_cards_* are the same for libdrm and mesa as mesa already has choice in VIDEO_CARDS, and for xf86-video-* this is only a check if libdrm has video_cards_* for the specific video card. (one line per ebuild, instead of depending only on libdrm should depend on libdrm[video_cards_*=] for mesa and libdrm[video_cards_*] for the xf86_video_*) Overall all this is really simple to do, gives better support for other platforms than x86, and gives better control on what is installed or not. If you provide a build.log (like you're supposed to do), I'm willing to bet my lunch money this is going to be a dupe of bug #296482. If not, well, we'll see :) But do attach the build.log nonetheless. Thanks *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 296482 *** |