Summary: | [PATCH] sci-geosciences/gpsbabel has a bad configure.in for gentoo-freebsd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo/Alt | Reporter: | Dmitri Bogomolov <4glitch> |
Component: | FreeBSD | Assignee: | Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | sci-geosciences |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | FreeBSD | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
patch
diff against gpsbabel in tree aclocal.out ebuild with unconditional patch application diff against gpsbabel in tree |
Description
Dmitri Bogomolov
2009-11-17 15:01:17 UTC
Created attachment 210518 [details, diff]
patch
Created attachment 210520 [details, diff]
diff against gpsbabel in tree
Patch should be unconditional. (In reply to comment #3) > Patch should be unconditional. > I'm not sure, because first hunk is from freebsd ports. Also $(use_with usb libusb) is wrong configure option. ./configure said: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --without-libusb Could have been more sure if you posted the aclocal.out file as the message stated; but it seems like it's perfectly fine to be applied unconditionally to me. Created attachment 210523 [details]
aclocal.out
/var/tmp/portage/sci-geosciences/gpsbabel-1.3.6/temp/aclocal.out
when only second hunk applyed
Patch is definitely fine to be applied unconditionally then. Created attachment 210529 [details]
ebuild with unconditional patch application
Created attachment 210531 [details]
diff against gpsbabel in tree
USE="-usb"
patch
eautoreconf
patch seems fine, please send it upstream. (In reply to comment #10) > patch seems fine, please send it upstream. > OK, I hope sourceforge will deliver my message to developer :) Any news here? Note that gpsbabel-1.4.0 has been released in the meantime. (In reply to comment #12) > Any news here? Note that gpsbabel-1.4.0 has been released in the meantime. > I cannot download it by ebuild Yes, problem remains in gpsbabel-1.4.1. I cannon contact developers through sf.net - sent a message, but unsure they received it. :( In main tree. |