Bug 292707 – Please figure out usage of -mminimal-toc in Qt ebuilds

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

[Description Dominik Kapusta (RETIRED) 2009-11-10 18:50:23 UTC]

Dear ppc64 team,

as we discussed it on IRC with JoseJX, please take a look at usage of -mminimal-toc across Qt ebuilds.

Currently, as a safety measure and for consistency, we apply that flag on all Qt ebuilds (bug 261632). Since it's reported to affect performance, please investigate whether it's safe to enforce it only on those ebuilds that require it to compile correctly.

Thanks a lot!

[Comment 1 Dominik Kapusta (RETIRED) 2009-11-10 19:30:56 UTC]

ping there, Bugzilla failed to send the bug report :)

[Comment 2 Joe Jezak (RETIRED) 2010-02-22 21:28:15 UTC]

Amarok is failing with this too

[Comment 3 Maciej Mrozowski 2010-06-13 01:52:49 UTC]

There is also bug 308903 which shows a few more KDE4 packages requiring it.

[Comment 4 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2012-03-12 21:59:20 UTC]

ping again.

[Comment 5 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2012-03-13 13:24:50 UTC]

there is a fix for all of this in gcc-4.7.  Let me see if it made gcc-4.6

[Comment 6 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2012-05-04 14:03:42 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)
> there is a fix for all of this in gcc-4.7.  Let me see if it made gcc-4.6

Brent, any news?

[Comment 7 Michael Palimaka (kensington) 2013-03-10 12:25:29 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)
> there is a fix for all of this in gcc-4.7.  Let me see if it made gcc-4.6

Ping.

[Comment 8 Davide Pesavento (RETIRED) 2013-12-28 23:23:51 UTC]

gcc-4.7.3 is stable on ppc64 now... can someone confirm this is no longer an issue with that (or a later) version?

On qt side, should we stop adding -mminimal-toc on ppc64 if the active gcc is new enough?

[Comment 9 Michael Palimaka (kensington) 2017-12-22 12:37:39 UTC]

This only affects Qt 4 which we're not going to spend any more time on.