Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 29254

Summary: updates for portage advertised even if there is nothing to update
Product: Portage Development Reporter: Alex Riesen <fork0>
Component: UnclassifiedAssignee: Portage team <dev-portage>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal    
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Alex Riesen 2003-09-21 02:15:23 UTC
I got the message after emerge sync:
 * An update to portage is available. It is _highly_ recommended
 * that you update portage now, before any other packages are updated.
 * Please do so and then update ALL of your configuration files.
But, when I tried to update it:
$ ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" USE="-java -esd -cups" emerge -p portage

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild   R   ] sys-apps/portage-2.0.49-r4  

Note the "R". No updates, as it seems. Consequent emerge -Up portage produced:
>>> --upgradeonly implies --update... adding --update to options.

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!

That is - nothing.

Reproducible: Sometimes
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-21 02:29:21 UTC
Does it want to downgrade portage if you set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" ?
Comment 2 Alex Riesen 2003-09-21 02:50:33 UTC
Yes. It clears the issue up, I think :)

$ ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" emerge -p portage

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild     UD] sys-apps/portage-2.0.49-r3 [2.0.49-r4] 
Comment 3 Marius Mauch (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-09-21 03:11:24 UTC
Nick, maybe we should change the check as normally there is no reason to downgrade portage (and the message is misleading). Marking this as invalid for now.
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-09-21 09:10:24 UTC
See Bug 27283
Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2003-09-21 09:10:30 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27283 ***