Summary: | hotkeys-0.5.4.ebuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Stacey Keast <slik> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | George Shapovalov (RETIRED) <george> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | slik |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://ypwong.org/hotkeys/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
hotkeys-0.5.4.ebuild
hotkeys-0.5.4-gentoo.diff.gz |
Description
Stacey Keast
2002-05-20 19:10:04 UTC
Created attachment 1069 [details]
hotkeys-0.5.4.ebuild
ebuild
Created attachment 1070 [details]
hotkeys-0.5.4-gentoo.diff.gz
Rather large patch, so gzipped
Hi Stacey Thanks for submitting an ebuild! I see you made xosd optional dependency. However I do not see xosd USE flag defined at this point. I can raise the question about introducing new use flag (basically it has to be listed in /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc), however I would like to see some supportive arguments (especially since xosd seems to be a small library): Are there any drawbacks of default inclusion of xosd into hotkeys (like introducing conflicts in certain cases..)? Do you know any other app that has xosd as an *optional* dependency? I would like to see some I committed an ebuild. Right now I removed xosd?, so that xosd dependency is "absolute". Please reopen the bug if you think there are strong arguments for introduction of new usevar. George |