Summary: | [gnome overlay] gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.28.0 failed compile failure | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andrey Ovcharov <sudormrfhalt> |
Component: | [OLD] GNOME | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | andybaker.brfc, flameeyes, ikelos, maxbritov |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.28.0 build.log
gnome-panel-2.28.0.ebuild gnome-panel-2.28.0-include.patch Alternative patch |
Description
Andrey Ovcharov
2009-10-06 07:27:38 UTC
Created attachment 206220 [details]
gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.28.0 build.log
Created attachment 206223 [details]
gnome-panel-2.28.0.ebuild
Created attachment 206225 [details]
gnome-panel-2.28.0-include.patch
(In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=206225) [details] > gnome-panel-2.28.0-include.patch > With this gnome-panel-2.28.0.ebuild and gnome-panel-2.28.0-include.patch build fine for my. *** Bug 287851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 287826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** somebody tell me why is this patch needed, this thing built just nice with gnome-desktop-2.26, did the header changed location without the pkgconfig file reflecting that somehow ? (In reply to comment #7) > somebody tell me why is this patch needed, this thing built just nice with > gnome-desktop-2.26, did the header changed location without the pkgconfig file > reflecting that somehow ? > I try to build without ebuilds (./configure && make...) And gnome-panel-2.28.0 build fine. But eclass gnome modify sources and build crash... patch gnome-panel-2.28.0-include.patch work for my *** Bug 287871 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 206243 [details, diff]
Alternative patch
Fixed in the overlay, with a revbump (I imported a patch from upstream which fixs various crashes too) thanks for reporting. Many thanks to Maxim for his patch :) *** Bug 288044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |