Summary: | x11-terms/xterm ROOT ping pong. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | solar (RETIRED) <solar> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo X packagers <x11> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dickey, embedded, ssuominen |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
solar (RETIRED)
![]() Couldn't xterm use pkg-config to check for X libs and then fallback to whatever scheme it currently uses? Thomas, what say you? Thanks Would pkg-config have more reliable information? I have macros which I use for the odd nonstandard library such as Xft. (In reply to comment #2) > Would pkg-config have more reliable information? > I have macros which I use for the odd nonstandard > library such as Xft. Just take a look at all the FDo-hosted apps, all of them use pkg-config and have dropped the old macros. As for Xft, I don't see what's non-standard about it : here's what "pkg-config --cflags --libs xft" returns on my system : -I/usr/include/freetype2 -lXft -lXrender -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lX11 Most Gnome apps that do custom X11 wizardry use pkg-config to find X libs, and usually fall back to the old X macros. Maybe that'd be a good solution for xterm if support for _really_ old/odd systems is important to you. Slightly OT, is there any reason (legal, historical, practical, ...) why xterm isn't hosted in a git repo at FDo either? Cheers regarding git - call it historical. 249 in tree with the $ROOT hack again, mentioned this bug in ChangeLog now so it won't get lost. Closing as UPSTREAM, please switch to using pkg-config. I did add a to-do item for this; implementing and testing it in the timeframe for #249 would have delayed more urgent fixes. |