Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 2855

Summary: pygame-1.4.9 ebuild (update)
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Phil Bordelon (sunflare) <phil>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Jon Nelson (RETIRED) <jnelson>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: High    
Version: 1.1a   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: ebuild for pygame-0.4.9
(Very slightly) edited ebuild to reflect its 1.4.9 status.

Description Phil Bordelon (sunflare) 2002-05-19 16:34:31 UTC
Pygame's up to 0.4.9 nowadays.  We only have 0.4.  Ug.

Here's a lovely ebuild to fix that problem.
Comment 1 Phil Bordelon (sunflare) 2002-05-19 16:35:45 UTC
Created attachment 1058 [details]
ebuild for pygame-0.4.9

Here it is.  I deleted a few lines out of the 0.4 ebuild, because it said that
a fix was in the upstream version, and, er, this is the upstream version.
Comment 2 Phil Bordelon (sunflare) 2002-05-20 23:51:25 UTC
ARG.  I don't know why I called it 0.4.9.  It's really 1.4.9.  Updating.
Comment 3 Phil Bordelon (sunflare) 2002-05-20 23:54:26 UTC
Created attachment 1074 [details]
(Very slightly) edited ebuild to reflect its 1.4.9 status.

Here you go.  All I changed was a comment in the file; it really was for 1.4.9.
 Ugh.
Comment 4 Jon Nelson (RETIRED) 2002-05-25 10:46:54 UTC
I just did the CVS commit for pygame 1.4.9
Thanks for the ebuild!

Comment 5 Pete Shinners 2002-05-25 21:17:09 UTC
Hello guys, this is pete (aka shredwheat). glad to see gentoo is on top of my
pygame releases :]

btw, i noticed in the ebuild you are doing a little awk magic on the
"config_unix.py" script. as of 1.4.9 you should no longer need to do this.

although no need to rush out and remove it. btw, pygame-1.5 should be out this
week, so perhaps then will be a good time to simplify the ebuild?
Comment 6 Phil Bordelon (sunflare) 2002-05-26 04:00:12 UTC
Not a bad idea.  I just adapted the 1.4 ebuild to work with the new version. 
Any cleaning of the script is a Good Thing, methinks.  I'll give it another
looksee when 0.5 comes out.

Thanks for the input, Pete.