Summary: | media-sound/amarok-utils is unneccessary, should be removed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead> |
Component: | [OLD] KDE | Assignee: | Gentoo KDE team <kde> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | Keywords: | InOverlay |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
James Broadhead
2009-09-08 00:20:34 UTC
amarok-2.1.80 is already in the kde-testing overlay. http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=commit;h=b04a09fa5f499f58b603b81dc5cde2270f7787b3 As this is a beta release, I'll leave it in the overlay for now. (In reply to comment #1) > amarok-2.1.80 is already in the kde-testing overlay. Awesome. My previous comment about amarok-utils stands however. I'll change the bug title to reflect. Longer version: It's a messy duplication of an ebuild, for a single flag. This should be handled by USE flags. (eg. USE=player -utilities) (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > amarok-2.1.80 is already in the kde-testing overlay. > > Awesome. My previous comment about amarok-utils stands however. I'll change the > bug title to reflect. > > Longer version: > It's a messy duplication of an ebuild, for a single flag. This should be > handled by USE flags. (eg. USE=player -utilities) amarok has been split in amarok and amarok-utils. Your reasoning would also apply to all apps in each of the kde tarballs, but we've opted a long time to introduce them and recently to only support split ebuilds. Although I haven't splitted the ebuilds myself, I've been bumping them and it seems some people might be interested just in the utils. (In reply to comment #3) > amarok has been split in amarok and amarok-utils. Your reasoning would also > apply to all apps in each of the kde tarballs, but we've opted a long time to > introduce them and recently to only support split ebuilds. > Although I haven't splitted the ebuilds myself, I've been bumping them and it > seems some people might be interested just in the utils. Ah - fiar enough. I didn't know that was how it worked. Still, the situation where someone only wanted amarok-utils and not amarok is covered by my example with USE="-player utilities" I'm closing this bug as amarok-2.2 has been put in the tree (original purpose of the bug) and as we won't be merging the ebuilds again - therefore WONTFIX. |