Summary: | wxHexEditor - new hexadecimal editor (wxGTK based) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Marcin Kowalski <yoshi3> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | wxwidgets |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://wxhexeditor.sourceforge.net | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
sample ebuild
fixes for 'app-editors/wxhexeditor' ebuild 0.09 Alpha ebuild for 'app-editors/wxhexeditor' prettier svn ebuild 0.10 pre-beta ebuild |
Description
Marcin Kowalski
2009-09-07 17:07:46 UTC
Created attachment 203373 [details]
sample ebuild
example ebuild; feel free to fix it up - i've based it off codeblocks live ebuild
Created attachment 241151 [details]
fixes for 'app-editors/wxhexeditor' ebuild
Through the feature provided by the wxwidgets eclass to select the default wxGTK configuration if the user has not yet made his/her choice (eselect wxwidgets), compilation process should now go trough without too much hassle.
Noticed a typo in the makefile : 'BINDI' variable instead of 'BINDIR'.
Also setting 'DESTDIR=' to '${D}' at install time was somehow ignored, so I added a sed patch to fix those two things.
Created attachment 241159 [details]
0.09 Alpha ebuild for 'app-editors/wxhexeditor'
Created attachment 241163 [details]
prettier svn ebuild
The DESTDIR issue I explained earlier was a problem on my end.
Sorry about the many updates in a row I'm new to this :)
Added to the tree. Thanks. Created attachment 267079 [details]
0.10 pre-beta ebuild
A pre-beta of v0.10 has been released. The gcc45 patch from the 0.09 ebuild fails but I don't think it is needed anymore?
Added a sed patch to add the user's custom CXXFLAGS, LDFLAGS to the makefile.
Tested on amd64, x86 with gcc-4.5.2 and gcc-4.6.0.
Use a new bug for version bumps. But I don't think we'll be adding pre-beta's - poke us when 0.10 is out. (In reply to comment #7) > Use a new bug for version bumps. But I don't think we'll be adding pre-beta's > - poke us when 0.10 is out. Ok, I thought it was better to have everything in one place? Development on this project is quite slow so it might be a while until the real release. So, I just file a new bug once 0.10 is out? Thanks. |