| Summary: | binary package soname dependencies | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Zac Medico <zmedico> |
| Component: | Binary packages support | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | esigra |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | InVCS |
| Version: | 2.1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547036 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | 534206 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 155723, 240323, 678972, 694246 | ||
|
Description
Zac Medico
2009-08-25 06:09:28 UTC
I've posted a proposal for generation of binary package soname dependencies using new PROVIDES_EXCLUDE and REQUIRES_EXCLUDE ebuild metadata variables: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/94145 I'm working on this in the following branch: https://github.com/zmedico/portage/tree/binpkg-soname-deps I've posted for review a patch to generate soname dependencies: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/5154 Soname dependency resolution is now implemented, and posted for review: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/5208 (In reply to Zac Medico from comment #4) > Soname dependency resolution is now implemented, and posted for review: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/5208 In the master branch now: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/f1c1b8a77eebf7713b32e5f9945690f60f4f46de https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/11467fc640995e3dc8897c82bbc7130d5bf27d05 (In reply to Zac Medico from comment #0) > After building the dependency graph, we can check selected binary packages > to verify that they don't depend on preserved libraries. Current soname dependency resolution only supports --usepkgonly. We could still add a sanity check for @preserve-rebuild that works with --usepkg. Released in portage-2.2.18 |