Summary: | sys-apps/raidutils-0.0.6-r1 silently segfaults with recent kernels | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | John R. Graham <john_r_graham> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Patch to fix reported issues.
New ebuild applied the above patch. My emerge --info. Patch to current raidutils--0.0.6-r1.ebuild to correct issue. |
Description
John R. Graham
2009-08-23 17:04:27 UTC
Created attachment 202055 [details, diff]
Patch to fix reported issues.
Created attachment 202057 [details]
New ebuild applied the above patch.
Created attachment 202063 [details]
My emerge --info.
Created attachment 230147 [details, diff]
Patch to current raidutils--0.0.6-r1.ebuild to correct issue.
Per a recommendation from Polynomial-C, I should be providing patches to ebuilds as opposed to new ebuilds to make it easier for the developers review the changes. Also, since the bug was filed, some cleanup has been done by Ulrich Mueller to the in-tree ebuild. The patch takes these changes into account as well.
This looks to be fixed by 0.0.6-r2 (it has latest Fedora changes). This appears to work on the hardware. My RAID management scripts will be exercising it more or less continuously. Just out of curiosity, why was this pushed to stable? Why isn't it in testing? - John Reopening for comment on skipped testing phase. - John Well, maybe nobody else uses this but me. It's been stable on my system for a looong time now. Closing as FIXED. |