Summary: | gnome-extra/gnome-power-manager-2.26.4 suspend dilemma about --{en,dis}able-legacy-buttons | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Colin Macdonald <cbm> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome> |
Status: | RESOLVED NEEDINFO | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | serge |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 263083 |
Description
Colin Macdonald
2009-08-10 02:51:09 UTC
we will stick to enable-legacy-buttons for this release because disabling it would break more setups than it would fix. To fix your double suspend issue, you need to inspect your hal/kernel setup. Hal might have some tricks that does not apply anymore since you have a recent kernel or some such. (In reply to comment #1) > we will stick to enable-legacy-buttons for this release because disabling it > would break more setups than it would fix. In that case, 2.27 will see a lot of breakage... perhaps it is useful to introduce USE flag? (In reply to comment #1) > we will stick to enable-legacy-buttons for this release because disabling it > would break more setups than it would fix. To fix your double suspend issue, > you need to inspect your hal/kernel setup. Hal might have some tricks that does > not apply anymore since you have a recent kernel or some such. > I have the same problem of twice resume. Do I need to update hal ? thanks Maybe the double-suspend issue could be related with upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597189 How does g-p-m-2.28.3 behave? (In reply to comment #6) > How does g-p-m-2.28.3 behave? > Please get back to us |