Summary: | please re-evaluate sys-fs/udev package mask entry | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Thomas Witt <bugs> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | udev maintainers <udev-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | rion4ik |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Thomas Witt
2009-07-28 17:29:55 UTC
I think you're right about that mask entry being obsolete... assigning to udev maintainers. Ok, the description is too old. Basically I wanted to wait for Bug #278302 to be resolved (all users of vol_id and libvolume_id being converted to blkid and libblkid). For now the only left issue is Bug #278305 (mdadm using vol_id in udev rules). So we can unmask udev soon. Another question is: How should all those udev extras be handled? For now they get enabled/disabled all together using USE=extras that is disabled by default. don't unmask it. at least udev-145 is very unstable for me. all apps start crashing in *random* time. it needs testing. (In reply to comment #3) > don't unmask it. > at least udev-145 is very unstable for me. > all apps start crashing in *random* time. it needs testing. > Please give some examples. Which apps do crash? Best is to open a new bug and make it block this one. (In reply to comment #4) > Please give some examples. Which apps do crash? any app may crash. mostly which do some active disk operations: emerge, gcc, firefox(working with sqlite?). but seems its reproducible not always, it may work fine on next boot for example. i've downgraded udev and now everything works fine. I don't want to test it anymore until it become stable. (In reply to comment #5) > any app may crash. mostly which do some active disk operations: emerge, gcc, > firefox(working with sqlite?). but seems its reproducible not always, it may > work fine on next boot for example. strange. udev should not influence any app after creating device nodes. > > i've downgraded udev and now everything works fine. I don't want to test it > anymore until it become stable. > Well fine. But then we can have no more progress and need to unmask it to get this bug reported by someone else. mask removed. |