| Summary: | Nedit version bump needed (RC1 available) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sergey Kuleshov (RETIRED) <svyatogor> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | bartron, leroutier |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://nedit.org | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
semi-working ebuild
nedit-5.4_rc1.ebuild files/nedit-5.4RC1-gentoo_pre.diff |
||
|
Description
Sergey Kuleshov (RETIRED)
2003-08-30 10:25:22 UTC
This is not my area of expertise. Plz assign it someone who will manage to make this into portage. Added app-i18n/bidiv Sorry, closed wrong bug Created attachment 18747 [details]
semi-working ebuild
I version-bumped this nedit ebuild, but it fails when linking. I'd like to
see
if anyone can get it to work...
Sorry, forgot to post the link errors in my last comment, file.o(.text+0x1b4a): In function `PrintString': : warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x69): In function `_XEditResCheckMessages': : undefined reference to `_XEditResResetStream' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x7d): In function `_XEditResCheckMessages': : undefined reference to `_XEditResPut8' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x1ab): In function `SendFailure': : undefined reference to `_XEditResResetStream' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x1be): In function `SendFailure': : undefined reference to `_XEditResPutString8' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x221): In function `SendCommand': (... redundant lines cut out ...) : undefined reference to `_XEditResPutString8' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x2cb4): In function `ExecuteGetResources': : undefined reference to `_XEditResPutString8' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x30a5): In function `DumpChildren': : undefined reference to `_XEditResPut32' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x35eb): In function `DumpChildren': : undefined reference to `_XEditResPut32' /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.a(EditresCom.o)(.text+0x3606): In function `DumpChildren': : undefined reference to `_XEditResPut32' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [nedit] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/nedit-5.4_rc1/work/nedit/source' make: *** [linux] Error 2 !!! ERROR: app-editors/nedit-5.4_rc1 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 30, Exitcode 2 !!! (no error message) Also, I had to add the flag -DBUILD_BROKEN_NEDIT because it doesn't like OpenMotif 2.2.* The only other thing I did was modify the tarball so that it extracted a correct path in the work dir. The undefined references are because nedit by default links with static motif libraries and openmotif-2.2 for some unknown reason adds references to resedit functions (which are in libXmu). Possible workarounds are to link to the shared libXm (pulls in libXmu automatically), or add `-lXmu' to the link line. However... there's still the problem that nedit developers consider both openmotif-2.2 and lesstif-0.93.40 "known-bad". They definitely have a point with lesstif-0.93.40 (frequently takes focus from the main text field and there's no way to move it back). Adding `-DBUILD_BROKEN_NEDIT' allows nedit to build, but on the other hand does just that... it builds a broken version of nedit, and also adds a section to the `version' help page telling users to complain to their linux distributor to build nedit with a stable motif. There's currently work underway to move motif and lesstif to different (also nedit-compatible) versions that also allows them to be installed at the same time, but until that is sorted out -- Created attachment 19080 [details]
nedit-5.4_rc1.ebuild
- builds nedit against shared motif libs
- adds `-DBUILD_BROKEN_NEDIT' only if neccessary
(question: 5.3 depends on aspell only if "spell" is in USE,
but builds the exact same binary even if it is not, is that
correct? Changed to hard depend for now).
Created attachment 19081 [details]
files/nedit-5.4RC1-gentoo_pre.diff
required patch
rc2 is out... test ebuild is here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29388#c44 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29388 *** |