| Summary: | >=sys-auth/pam_krb5-3.12: SSH doesn't spawn a shell when using key exchange or kerberos | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Xiwen Cheng <x> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | PAM Gentoo Team (OBSOLETE) <pam-bugs+disabled> |
| Status: | RESOLVED TEST-REQUEST | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | kerberos |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
successful testcase with pam_krb5-3.10
successful testcase with pam_krb5-3.12 |
||
|
Description
Xiwen Cheng
2009-06-24 12:12:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) all occurrences of pam_krb-3.10 should be sys-auth/pam_krb5-3.10, same for pam_krb-3.12. In your pam config file, add "debug" parameter to the pam_krb5 entries, and re-enable pam for ssh. Then what pam messages do you see logged after the unsuccessful ssh attempts? Reopen this bug when you provide the requested information. Created attachment 200141 [details]
successful testcase with pam_krb5-3.10
SSH works in combination with pam_krb5-3.10
Created attachment 200143 [details]
successful testcase with pam_krb5-3.12
SSH doesn't work in combination with pam_krb5-3.12
(In reply to comment #2) > In your pam config file, add "debug" parameter to the pam_krb5 entries, and > re-enable pam for ssh. Then what pam messages do you see logged after the > unsuccessful ssh attempts? > As requested, I have attached two usecases (working and nonworking situations). ** sorry for replying this late. Returned from vacation not long ago :p Experiencing the same issue here, also confirmed that machines still equiped with pam_krb5-3.10 work and machines with pam_krb5-3.12 do not work! Pretty annoying bug since our systems rely on ldap domain auth (which works if you leave pam on) but also several people use keys (which only works when pam is Off!) So either you can log in with a pubkey or either with a domain password Can you check with pam_krb5-4.2 please? Thanks. Please reopen if it's still a problem with 4.2 |