Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 2750

Summary: ebuild for x11-libs/qt-3.0.4.1 fails due to missing sources
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Avi Schwartz <avi>
Component: [OLD] KDEAssignee: Dan Armak (RETIRED) <danarmak>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: lostlogic
Priority: High    
Version: 1.1a   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: patch, compiles and merges...

Description Avi Schwartz 2002-05-15 09:40:13 UTC
ftp.kde.org does not seem to have the required qt source tar ball:

>>> Downloading ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.0.1/src/qt-copy-3.0.4.tar.bz2
--09:33:38--  ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.0.1/src/qt-copy-3.0.4.tar.bz2
           => `/usr/portage/distfiles/qt-copy-3.0.4.tar.bz2'
Resolving ftp.kde.org... done.
Connecting to ftp.kde.org[131.220.60.97]:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD /pub/kde/stable/3.0.1/src ...
No such directory `pub/kde/stable/3.0.1/src'.
Comment 1 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-05-15 15:00:21 UTC
I think we should use the trolltech ftp as the SRC_URI for this rather than the
KDE ftp, I'll submit a patch as soon as it finishes compiling.
Comment 2 Brandon Low (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-05-15 15:50:35 UTC
Created attachment 1007 [details, diff]
patch, compiles and merges...

I don't actually know if this is the same source as that which is pointed to in
the original ebuild, but since I could find no referenct to qt-3.0.4.1
anywhere, this is what I dug up.
Comment 3 Andreas Waschbuesch 2002-05-15 15:53:50 UTC
Seems to me that qt-copy-3.0.4.tar.bz2 doesn't exist. Neither @kde.org
mor@trolltech.com ...
Comment 4 Dan Armak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-05-16 08:33:44 UTC
qt-copy-3.0.4 comes with kde-3.0.1 and hasn't been released yet, only packagers (me, Verwilst and some testers) have it atm. The qt-3.0.4.1 ebuild is masked, at least I see it as masked here?... 
Comment 5 Avi Schwartz 2002-05-16 09:53:24 UTC
It is masked now.  It wasn't yesterday.  You can close the bug now that it is
masked.
Comment 6 Dan Armak (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2002-05-16 11:54:13 UTC
Yes, it was unmasked accidentally for a day, masked again now.