| Summary: | dev-lisp/ecls version bump request | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Dmitry <dmitry.ghost99> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Common Lisp Bugs <common-lisp> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | InOverlay |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://ecls.sourceforge.net/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | Just changed ecls-0.9j_p1 ebuild | ||
|
Description
Dmitry
2009-06-14 17:17:15 UTC
Created attachment 194897 [details] Just changed ecls-0.9j_p1 ebuild That ebuild works fine for me, but there is a bug in sources. It builds fine only without X use-flag (without --with-use-clx). Bug is reported to developers ( http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2807203&group_id=30035&atid=398053 ) Any reason why we wouldn't want this bumped? (In reply to comment #2) > Any reason why we wouldn't want this bumped? > ecls-9.6.0 is in lisp overlay already. It seems to new ebuilds can be found only in lisp overlay, therefore that is normal. Or not? (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Any reason why we wouldn't want this bumped? > > > > ecls-9.6.0 is in lisp overlay already. > It seems to new ebuilds can be found only in lisp overlay, therefore that is > normal. It isn't normal. Bump requests in this tracker are only really fixed by bumps in the main tree. > Or not? If the overlay is good enough for you, please use IRC or our mailing list to ask for bumps. Especially with the volume of requests you've been doing. dev-lisp/ecls-9999 can't be built because of presence of string:
epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PV}/headers-gentoo.patch
This is old patch for ecl-0.9j .
dev-lisp/ecls can't be built if boehm-gc emerged without "threads" use-flag.
Ok, fixed. ecls-9.12.3 and ecls-9.8.4 are in the tree for some time. |
