Summary: | Stable =dev-libs/g-wrap-1.9.11 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) <ssuominen> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Scheme Project <scheme> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | fmccor, hkbst, jer |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 199368, 274383, 275222 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
build log
environment log |
Description
Samuli Suominen (RETIRED)
2009-06-04 18:46:17 UTC
Adding arch's as it's pretty major qa violation as is. To test, please check Comment #0 first. I gather you also want [dev-libs, virtual]/libffi marked stable? Otherwise, this can't be. (What happens if you make [dev-libs, virtual]/libffi PDEPENDs in gcc if USE=libffi in gcc?) If this is also a request to mark the libffi's stable, then sparc is OK. Yes this is a request to mark this version of g-wrap stable because it's using dev-libs or virtual/libffi, which is also a go. I'm fast pacing this because I want to package.use.mask sys-devel/gcc libffi USE flag soon as possible. And on top of that GCC bundles old copy of libffi, we have new virtual/libffi, believe it or not, old g-wrap versions also come with a copy! So please mark stable: latest dev-libs/libffi latest virtual/libffi =dev-libs/g-wrap-1.9.11 so we can move on to having a single, up to date, libffi in tree :) Dunno about the PDEPEND idea, I'm hoping the USE libffi will eventually entirely die from gcc and this virtual/libffi version of ffi will be kept maintained. Sparc stable; sparc also stable for dev-scheme/guile-lib-0.1.3 which is a [R]FEPEND for g-wrap-1.9.11. Note that repoman needs a bit of coaxing, because ~hppa, ~ppc64 are keyworded for g-wrap-1.9.11 but not for guile-lib. x86 stable Created attachment 194244 [details]
build log
Created attachment 194245 [details]
environment log
As this become stable I wqsn't able to compile it. Attached you can find build log and environment. amd64 stable (In reply to comment #9) > As this become stable I wqsn't able to compile it. > Attached you can find build log and environment. > Please open a new bug for separate issues. Added 272673 as a blocker since dev-scheme/guile-lib-0.1.3 fails to compile on alpha (In reply to comment #5) > Sparc stable; sparc also stable for dev-scheme/guile-lib-0.1.3 which is a > [R]FEPEND for g-wrap-1.9.11. Note that repoman needs a bit of coaxing, because > ~hppa, ~ppc64 are keyworded for g-wrap-1.9.11 but not for guile-lib. Marked ~hppa. Readding ppc64. Stable for HPPA, forced because of: RDEPEND.bad 6 dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit-use rland/developer) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit-use rland/desktop) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit-use rland) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11-r1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit- userland/developer) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11-r1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit- userland/desktop) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11-r1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit- userland) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] DEPEND.bad 6 dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit-use rland/developer) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit-use rland/desktop) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit-use rland) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11-r1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit- userland/developer) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11-r1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit- userland/desktop) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] dev-libs/g-wrap/g-wrap-1.9.11-r1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default/linux/powerpc/ppc64/2008.0/64bit- userland) ['dev-scheme/guile-lib'] Regarding alpha's dep on bug 274383: hkbst says guile-lib-0.1.6 would a sensible replacement for the broken-on-alpha 0.1.3. I suggest leaving it in ~alpha for 30 days, then stabilizing it and g-wrap-1.9.11. Any objections? (In reply to comment #15) > Regarding alpha's dep on bug 274383: hkbst says guile-lib-0.1.6 would a > sensible replacement for the broken-on-alpha 0.1.3. I suggest leaving it in > ~alpha for 30 days, then stabilizing it and g-wrap-1.9.11. Any objections? > I don't have any objections, I suggest going with what hkbst says on scheme -issues since everytime I touch it; something breaks. May be luck, or not. ;-) But you might still do virtual/libffi, dev-libs/libffi sooner, since pygobject also deps on them, and it will be required for gnome's stable bug which they are planning. Stabilized dev-libs/libffi and virtual/libffi. And finally stabilized =dev-libs/g-wrap-1.9.11 on alpha ppc stable This bug is now major because it's blocking us from fixing dep. atoms in libffi to block gcc's libffi. 05 Sep 2009; Brent Baude <ranger@gentoo.org> g-wrap-1.9.11.ebuild: Marking g-wrap-1.9.11 ppc64 for bug 272675 |