Bug 271147 – dev-ruby/activesupport-* bundle some of its dependencies

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2009-05-24 22:41:48 UTC]

While I was working on the overlay for the new ruby-ng eclass, I noticed one fun thing:

flame@yamato activesupport-2.3.2 % ls -l lib/active_support/vendor           
totale 0
drwxr-xr-x 3 flame flame 100 2009-03-16 04:08 builder-2.1.2
drwxr-xr-x 4 flame flame 160 2009-03-16 04:08 i18n-0.1.3
drwxr-xr-x 2 flame flame  60 2009-03-16 04:08 memcache-client-1.6.5
drwxr-xr-x 3 flame flame  80 2009-03-16 04:08 tzinfo-0.3.12

this is probably why the ebuild has no dependencies as it is.. I'll see to get rid of them in the new ebuild, but at least we can track the issue here...

[Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2009-05-24 22:44:01 UTC]

For the record:

/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.2/lib/active_support/vendor:
builder-2.1.2  memcache-client-1.5.0  tzinfo-0.3.11  xml-simple-1.0.11

/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.2.2/lib/active_support/vendor:
builder-2.1.2  i18n-0.0.1  memcache-client-1.5.1  tzinfo-0.3.12  xml-simple-1.0.11

[Comment 2 Hans de Graaff 2009-12-20 10:20:47 UTC]

dev-ruby/activesupport-2.3.5-r1 now used the unbundled versions of builder and tzinfo.

That leaves:
i18n-0.1.3/  memcache-client-1.7.4/

[Comment 3 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2010-01-13 13:24:27 UTC]

-r2 dropped i18n, and memcache-client is the only one left for now.

[Comment 4 David J Cozatt 2010-01-21 23:18:24 UTC]

Created attachment 217119 [details]
build.log it says but a bit truncated

will attach emerge info and the environment log if needed and or open a new bug upon request

[Comment 5 Alex Legler (RETIRED) 2010-01-21 23:23:20 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=217119) [details]
> build.log it says but a bit truncated
> 
> will attach emerge info and the environment log if needed and or open a new bug
> upon request
> 

You installed a non-gentoo version of rubygems. Do not report a new bug.

[Comment 6 David J Cozatt 2010-01-22 05:55:09 UTC]

no fella.I did a gem install of activesupport after the above failure. on stable not amd64. but I will recreate it and post a new bug. without the gem install.

[Comment 7 Hans de Graaff 2010-12-31 13:38:59 UTC]

activesupport 3.0.3 no longer has any vendored code, so I'm inclined to close this bug. Objections?