Summary: | portage ignores FEATURES="-strict" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Adam Carheden <adam.carheden> |
Component: | Eclasses | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | zmedico |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2008.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Adam Carheden
2009-05-08 07:31:00 UTC
I think invalid. As noted in the output, while on x86, those are warnings only, on amd64 they become almost certainly crashers. "poor code kills airplanes" message has been changed to "install aborted due to poor programming practices shown above" in newer versions of Portage. This message indicates serious problems which cannot be ignored. Please report a bug in sci-geosciences/vis5d+. (In reply to comment #2) > "poor code kills airplanes" message has been changed to "install aborted due to > poor programming practices shown above" in newer versions of Portage. This > message indicates serious problems which cannot be ignored. > > Please report a bug in sci-geosciences/vis5d+. > Come on, you know that's total crap. I've got the exact same version of vis5d+ that works just fine installed with a previous version of Portage. Probably one little bug in one file that would crash if I used some obscure feature of the software, but overall it's fine. And because you guys are stubborn, I've got to figure out how to make my own post_install script not do that (if it's even possible). Don't be stupid. This is a PORTAGE bug. I'm not complaining that vis5d+ has bad programming practices. I'm complaining that PORTAGE ignores it's own -strict use flag. Clearly -strict should cause portage not to run this check, but it doesn't. It's PORTAGE, not vis5d+, that has the problem I'm complaining about. Don't make me install RHEL. Or worse yet, I hear Windows 7 is actually pretty good, even on low-end hardware. The change in behavior was intentional. http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage?rev=12793&view=rev |