| Summary: | OpenERP-Server OpenEPR-web | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | INODE64 Sistemas <web> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Default Assignee for New Packages <maintainer-wanted> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | barrie.backhurst, it-knodel, jdavid.ibp, jesse, metolic147, tom.gl, ygorbunov |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
openerp-server-5.0.0.ebuild
openerp-conf.d openerp-init.d openerp-web-5.0.0.ebuild openerp-web-conf.d openerp-web-init.d OpenERP server ebuild for 5.0.1-0 version (2009-05-28) OpenERP server conf.d for 5.0.1-0 version (2009-05-28) OpenERP server init.d for 5.0.1-0 version (2009-05-28) openerp-server-5.0.1.ebuild openerp-conf.d openerp-init.d openerp-web-5.0.1.ebuild Fix no create user in configure openerp-server-5.0.6.ebuild openerp-web-init.d openerp-web-5.0.6.ebuild |
||
|
Description
INODE64 Sistemas
2009-04-29 15:18:35 UTC
Created attachment 189852 [details]
openerp-server-5.0.0.ebuild
Created attachment 189853 [details]
openerp-conf.d
Created attachment 189854 [details]
openerp-init.d
Created attachment 189856 [details]
openerp-web-5.0.0.ebuild
Created attachment 189858 [details]
openerp-web-conf.d
Created attachment 189861 [details]
openerp-web-init.d
Created attachment 192858 [details]
OpenERP server ebuild for 5.0.1-0 version (2009-05-28)
Tested with python-2.5, python-2.4 seems to have problems with the client.
- version bump
- changed old user ("terp") to "oerp"
- dependency review, following official site
In my box dev-python/psycopg-2.0.8 and 2.0.9 can't be imported as python modules by the installer, 2.0.10 is fine (masked version). If this psycopg behaviour is confirmed I'll update the ebuild dependecy.
Psycopg-2.0.10 also need dev-db/libpq-8.2.7 and virtual/postgresql-base-8.2 (both masked). I suggest to use last masked version of postgresql (8.2.7) as db.
Basically:
# emerge postgresql-8.2.7
# emerge --config =postgresql-8.2.7
# /etc/init.d/postgresql start
# emerge openerp-server
# emerge --config =openerp-server-5.0.0
# /etc/init.d/openerp start
Should work "out-of-the-box". Be sure to use python-2.5, config and init.d files provided with this ebuild.
Help needed to write the openerp-client ebuild, I'm not very good in bash and previous ebuilds posted in bugzilla don't work in my box.
Please leave a feedback if you try the ebuild, thanks.
Created attachment 192859 [details]
OpenERP server conf.d for 5.0.1-0 version (2009-05-28)
Created attachment 192860 [details]
OpenERP server init.d for 5.0.1-0 version (2009-05-28)
My package.keywords: dev-db/postgresql ~x86 dev-python/psycopg ~x86 dev-db/libpq ~x86 app-office/openerp-server ~x86 <virtual/postgresql-base-8.3 ~x86 tested on vmware VM 32bit. Created attachment 195475 [details]
openerp-server-5.0.1.ebuild
update from Francesco G and change terp to oerp
Created attachment 195476 [details]
openerp-conf.d
Created attachment 195478 [details]
openerp-init.d
Created attachment 195480 [details]
openerp-web-5.0.1.ebuild
Created attachment 196060 [details]
Fix no create user in configure
(In reply to comment #15) > Created an attachment (id=196060) [edit] > Fix no create user in configure > Where can I find this ebuild in which overlay? I want to test it also ^_^ Available in yarik-overlay Created attachment 212212 [details]
openerp-server-5.0.6.ebuild
New version and remove dead deps
Created attachment 212213 [details]
openerp-web-init.d
Update init for 5.0.6
Created attachment 212214 [details]
openerp-web-5.0.6.ebuild
New version and update deps
I have installed the 5.0.6 ebuilds with dev-db/postgresql-8.1.11 and I was able to create a database and start using the web client. No sooner had I done so, Postgresql produced blocks on a world update and I unmerged dev-db/postgresql-8.1.11 and libpq allowing portage to install dev-db/postgresql-base-8.4.2-r1 and its related packages. I re-emerged the 5.0.6 ebuilds, ran the configuration, both services appear to start OK and the webclient opens using the localhost:8080 address. However I have been unable to create a new database via the web client and I would welcome any suggestions on how to proceed. Incidentally I had to remove the --quiet flag from the createuser server config because it is no longer supported in postgresql-base-8.4.2-r1. I cannot imagine that this is the cause of my problems though. Commited to tree a few days ago. (In reply to comment #21) > I have installed the 5.0.6 ebuilds with dev-db/postgresql-8.1.11 and I was able > to create a database and start using the web client. No sooner had I done so, > Postgresql produced blocks on a world update and I unmerged > dev-db/postgresql-8.1.11 and libpq allowing portage to install > dev-db/postgresql-base-8.4.2-r1 and its related packages. I re-emerged the > 5.0.6 ebuilds, ran the configuration, both services appear to start OK and the > webclient opens using the localhost:8080 address. However I have been unable to > create a new database via the web client and I would welcome any suggestions on > how to proceed. > > Incidentally I had to remove the --quiet flag from the createuser server config > because it is no longer supported in postgresql-base-8.4.2-r1. I cannot imagine > that this is the cause of my problems though. > Returning after nearly a year, I discovered via gentoo-wiki.com that I had not entered my locale via PG_INITDB_OPTS in /etc/conf.d/postgresql-8.4 and this was blocking the creation of new databases (In reply to comment #22) > Commited to tree a few days ago. > Good to see the commit, however the pkg_config() still has the --quiet option applied to createuser and this is not recognised by the current stable postgresql(8.4.5), causing the script to fail. Also the latest stable openerp version is 5.0.15 and version 6 is in the release candidate stage, is it possible to have ebuilds for these committed to the tree or should a new bug be opened? I have found an ebuild for 5.0.14 in the yarik-overlay which appears to be based on the ebuild attached above, however I notice that the committed ebuild differs from these, are these changes significant(i.e no ssl USE flag) or is it OK to use the overlay version? |
