| Summary: | net-libs/xulrunner: add lcms use flag for systems that don't have it | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | kunitoki (Lucio Asnaghi) <kunitoki> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Mozilla Gentoo Team <mozilla> |
| Status: | VERIFIED CANTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | patch for net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0.9.ebuild | ||
|
Description
kunitoki (Lucio Asnaghi)
2009-04-27 15:25:48 UTC
Created attachment 189617 [details, diff]
patch for net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0.9.ebuild
What? If you don't do that it would link against included lcms, and we don't want that. There's no point on this. (In reply to comment #0) > Xulrunner are actually a blocker against lcms, cause it doesn't provide "lcms" > use flags as other packages do. > lcms has keywords for all arches. If you specifically don't want lcms to be pulled by xulrunner, please provide a patch that makes it optional (and does not break things), since the configure flag only controls whether the internal lcms or an external lcms will be used. Closing CANTFIX. *** Bug 267655 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** i only don't want to pull in lcms includes and library system wise, i don't mind if xulrunner use its own internal copy since it is not dirtying with lcms headers and libraries my system /usr directory. I find my patches OK, they don't break anything, they only add more choices (isnìt gentoo all about choices ? well not for you not !) Luckily i have my own gentoo-experimental overlay and i'm doing my (working) patches, if i wait you i'll get additional grey hair... Thanx a lot devs ! |
