Summary: | 'revision' tag change in package name | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Serge Matveev <sergem> |
Component: | Core - Ebuild Support | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
untested patch
updated patch updated patch |
Description
Serge Matveev
2003-08-15 06:47:52 UTC
Created attachment 18495 [details, diff]
untested patch
This is a highly untested patch to implement a vendor tag after the release
number. It might break portage completely, so a backup is handy.
Created attachment 18516 [details, diff]
updated patch
this patch fixes the 9>10 bug from the previous patch
Created attachment 18921 [details, diff]
updated patch
fixed a problem with ~ dependencies
Test this in catalyst or some other vigourus way. Marius, did your version handling rewrite in some way address this (don't have the regex in front of me atm). nope, IIRC I had some issues (collate sequence being one) with this and didn't really track it anymore. Putting a hold on feature requests for portage as they are drowning out the bugs. Most of these features should be available in the next major version of portage. But for the time being, they are just drowning out the major bugs and delaying the next version's progress. Any bugs that contain patches and any bugs for etc-update or dispatch-conf can be reopened. Sorry, I'm just not good enough with bugzilla. ;) Reopen for duping *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 152990 *** |