Summary: | net-im/coccinella-0.95.10 fails to start with message "X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Simeon Maryasin <marsoft> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | v_2e |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | coccinella-0.96.21.ebuild |
Description
Simeon Maryasin
2009-02-28 23:05:39 UTC
Looks like I have the similar problem. Except that in my case the output to terminal was a bit different: -------------------------- X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 91 (X_QueryColors) Value in failed request: 0xff000000 Serial number of failed request: 405 Current serial number in output stream: 405 -------------------------- Reassigning to maintainer. Please recheck with 0.96.18 version Just for information: I've been using Coccinella 0.96.21 for about a year on Gentoo amd64. (In reply to comment #4) > Just for information: I've been using Coccinella 0.96.21 for about a year on > Gentoo amd64. Where did you got that version? Looks like 0.96.20 is the last one :-/ Created attachment 305963 [details] coccinella-0.96.21.ebuild (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Just for information: I've been using Coccinella 0.96.21 for about a year on > > Gentoo amd64. > > Where did you got that version? Looks like 0.96.20 is the last one :-/ 0.96.21 is the development (testing) version. I downloaded the sources here: http://thecoccinella.org/breakfast/Coccinella-0.96.21Src.tar.gz and created the .ebuild myself by slightly modifying my previous ebuilds for Coccinella attached to the Bug 306019 (In reply to comment #3) > Please recheck with 0.96.18 version Seems to work. Thanks. |