Summary: | readline-6.0 suggests deletion of needed libraries. revdep-rebuild does not notice change of readline. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Johannes Rauh <jarauh> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Johannes Rauh
2009-02-25 10:58:47 UTC
So why should this be a bug when you don't follow the suggestions the ebuild already gave you? How should revdep-rebuild (without the --library options) find any broken libs when the old lib{history,readline}.so.5 are still present in the system? They are kept for a reason to not break all those apps/packages that depend on readline. Quote from the revdep-rebuild man-page: "revdep-rebuild scans libraries and binaries for missing shared library dependencies and attempts to fix them by re-emerging those broken binaries and shared libraries." So as long as the old libs are still present, revdep-rebuild won't find anything _missing_. Either do what the readline-6.0 ebuild suggested or remove the old libs and run revdep-rebuild without any options. Anything else is kinda senseless regarding this readline upgrade. |