Summary: | dev-lang/nemerle-0.9.3 fails to build w/ >=dev-lang/mono-2.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michal Jakubowski <daemon> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | dotnet project <dotnet> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | flameeyes |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | PMASKED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555464 | ||
Whiteboard: | Pending Removal: 2012-02-22 | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 256261 |
Description
Michal Jakubowski
2009-02-20 12:32:11 UTC
mono --version, please I see something similar, though my error output does not match the above output exactly. Mono version 2.2 (ebuild version 2.2-r3). My error starts like: make[3]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/nemerle-0.9.3/work/nemerle-0.9.3/ncc' COMPILE [stage1] Nemerle.dll **__________................................................ ERROR:class.c:3259:mono_method_get_vtable_slot: assertion failed: (method->slot != -1) Stacktrace: at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.MonoType.GetPropertiesByName (string,System.Reflection.BindingFlags,bool,System.Type) <0x00004> ... at Nemerle.Collections.List.Iter<object> (Nemerle.Core.list`1<object>,Nemerle.Builtins.FunctionVoid`1<object>) <0x000bc> at Nemerle.Core.list`1<object>.Iter (Nemerle.Builtins.FunctionVoid`1<object>) <0x00026> and continues from there as in the original report. Package.masked so we can get bug 284306 on the road. Hopefully mono-2.6 has the stuff to build this, per this comment in upstream bug report: > ------- Comment #8 From Rodrigo Kumpera 2009-08-03 18:14:37 MDT > Dmitry, this is been worked on and should be working in a couple of weeks. Seems that this will be fixed finally :-) https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555464#c21 Personally I don't have much interest on trying to bump this to 1.0.0.9832 and maintain it, any other from dotnet team is willing to maintain this? If none of us wants, maybe we should lastrite this or drop to maintainer-needed :/ dropped |