Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 254594

Summary: x11-misc/xnots-0.2.1 version bump
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Gautam Iyer <gi1242>
Component: New packagesAssignee: Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) <nelchael>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: enhancement CC: desktop-misc
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Attachments: Ebuild for xnots-0.2.1
Diff to the new ebuild (0.2.1)
Ebuild for xnots-0.2.1 (incoporating

Description Gautam Iyer 2009-01-11 23:02:09 UTC
Hi,

xnots-0.2.1 was just released. I'm attaching an ebuild. Differences from previous ebuilds are:

    1. Warns the user if they don't have INOTIFY support in the kernel (without INOTIFY, xnots will be equivalent to "nop")
    2. Includes a "vim-syntax" use flag to install the xnots sytax file.
    3. Fix dependencies (0.2.1 also needs libXrandr to run and randrproto to compile).

GI

PS: Sorry to file the ebuild on the "0th day". It's not a 0-day version bump request (since there are changes to the ebuild). Plus I just released xnots-0.2.1, and it's a lot more convenient for me to submit the ebuild at the same time as the release.
Comment 1 Gautam Iyer 2009-01-11 23:03:31 UTC
Created attachment 178138 [details]
Ebuild for xnots-0.2.1

I forgot to mention: The URL for the project is http://xnots.sourceforge.net/
Comment 2 Thilo Bangert (RETIRED) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-01-12 20:08:31 UTC
please attach your changes as a diff against the latest ebuild in the tree.
thanks
Comment 3 Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-01-13 00:58:56 UTC
Bumped, thank you.
Comment 4 Gautam Iyer 2009-01-13 01:33:25 UTC
Created attachment 178313 [details, diff]
Diff to the new ebuild (0.2.1)
Comment 5 Gautam Iyer 2009-01-13 01:35:47 UTC
Created attachment 178315 [details]
Ebuild for xnots-0.2.1 (incoporating 

Includes a few changes that were in the official tree, which I forgot to include. Please use this instead when committing.
Comment 6 Gautam Iyer 2009-01-13 01:37:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Bumped, thank you.

Any chance you can use the new attachment instead? It's more similar to the one in the current tree, but functionally the same.

GI
Comment 7 Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-01-13 01:52:49 UTC
I've committed your version with changes from main tree merged -- which is almost exactly what you've attached: only EAPI="2" is missing before inherit.