| Summary: | www-servers/tomcat [SECURITY] CVE-2008-2938 Apache Tomcat information disclosure vulnerability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mike Weissman <mike> |
| Component: | [OLD] Java | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://tomcat.apache.org/security.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Mike Weissman
2008-12-18 19:59:09 UTC
I'm not entirely sure what this bug is about. We accepted CVE-2008-2938 to be an issue within Tomcat (as did upstream) and resolved it with updates to 6.0.18 and 5.5.27 per bug 225477. Is there any news I am missing (except that the old ebuilds might not have been removed yet)? (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not entirely sure what this bug is about. We accepted CVE-2008-2938 to be > an issue within Tomcat (as did upstream) and resolved it with updates to 6.0.18 > and 5.5.27 per bug 225477. > > Is there any news I am missing (except that the old ebuilds might not have been > removed yet)? > I read the other bug, and i felt that requesting that the effected packages be masked or at least marked unstable would be highjacking the closed bug. Also the Tomcat team is still unsure of: "the release of fixed JVMs and associated vulnerability disclosure has not been co-ordinated." So I didn't feel that issue was actually completely done with. Thanks, Mike Old versions are marked vulnerable by GLSA, removal is subject to java team guidelines. (In reply to comment #3) > Old versions are marked vulnerable by GLSA, removal is subject to java team > guidelines. > Old ebuilds nuked so I guess we are done here. |