Summary: | net-misc/tor < 2.0.32 Does not drop privileges (CVE-2008-{5397,5398}) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Security | Reporter: | Matti Bickel (RETIRED) <mabi> |
Component: | Vulnerabilities | Assignee: | Gentoo Security <security> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | minor | CC: | fauli, humpback, svrmarty |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | B4 [glsa] | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Matti Bickel (RETIRED)
![]() Please provide the newest ebuild.. New version is in the tree, thanks mabi. Arches please stabilise net-misc/tor-0.2.0.32 target KEYWORDS are: amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd Sparc, please check if bug 246483 is still relevant. I removed the patch from 0.2.0.31 as upstream mentions the bug in its ChangeLog. security team, I could not find a CVE assigned. amd64 stable ppc stable x86 stable ppc64 stable sparc stable (In reply to comment #2) > Sparc, please check if bug 246483 is still relevant. I removed the patch from > 0.2.0.31 as upstream mentions the bug in its ChangeLog. All good Ready for vote, I vote YES. Handling CVE-2008-5398 also here, because the same versions are affected and this bug fixes CVE-2008-5398, too. CVE-2008-5397: Tor before 0.2.0.32 does not properly process the (1) User and (2) Group configuration options, which might allow local users to gain privileges by leveraging unintended supplementary group memberships of the Tor process. CVE-2008-5398: Tor before 0.2.0.32 does not properly process the ClientDNSRejectInternalAddresses configuration option in situations where an exit relay issues a policy-based refusal of a stream, which allows remote exit relays to have an unknown impact by mapping an internal IP address to the destination hostname of a refused stream. Yes, too. Request filed. (In reply to comment #11) > Yes, too. Request filed. Can I help to prepare the GLSA? Or what is the status? (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Yes, too. Request filed. > > Can I help to prepare the GLSA? Or what is the status? > Just the request currently, a draft would be highly appreciated. :/ higher version needed, see bug #258833 GLSA 200904-11 |