Summary: | ekg2 removal request (was: net-im/ekg2 fails to build w/ glibc-2.8) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo TreeCleaner Project <treecleaner> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | bugzie, esigra, fauli, mgorny, net-im, pacho, victor.gaydov |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 225459 | ||
Attachments: | Build log |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2008-11-21 17:07:20 UTC
Created attachment 172712 [details]
Build log
This issue was fixed long time ago in SVN. Please take action here, Glibc 2.8 is going stable (or already is, on amd64 for example). i tried bumping this, but hit other errors i can't figure out how to fix. vote for removal. Masked for removal in ~60 days *** Bug 260549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #5) > Masked for removal in ~60 days > Why not provide an ebuild to build ekg2 from svn? I'm using it, it builds and works flawlessly. (In reply to comment #5) > Masked for removal in ~60 days Could you narrow the mask to cover only portage-specific ekg2 versions? Currently it catches also ebuilds from my overlay for which the bug doesn't apply to. (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Masked for removal in ~60 days > > > Why not provide an ebuild to build ekg2 from svn? > I'm using it, it builds and works flawlessly. > You need to ask from the maintainers at bug #187330 which is about bumping ekg2.. I'm only cleaning out old cruft that doesn't even compile with our stable libc :-) (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Masked for removal in ~60 days > > Could you narrow the mask to cover only portage-specific ekg2 versions? > Currently it catches also ebuilds from my overlay for which the bug doesn't > apply to. > Sure, done. Maybe you can provide some working ebuild in the bug mentioned above? Dunno. gone |