Summary: | Please stabilise net-mail/gnubiff-2.2.10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) <fauli> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Developers for the x86 Architecture <x86> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | DuPol |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 245160 |
Description
Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED)
2008-11-05 17:11:09 UTC
ping No maintainer response...let's do it Keywords: alpha x86 Stable on alpha. gnubiff-2.2.10 is keyworded ~amd64 as well, so amd64 should do it as well. (In reply to comment #4) > gnubiff-2.2.10 is keyworded ~amd64 as well, so amd64 should do it as well. > For this bug and the other 2 bugs that you commented on (bug 245571 & bug 245859). I didn't add amd64 because there is no previous stable keyword. I assume that you are *requesting* stable keywords on all so that we are not wasting our time that can be better used elsewhere? (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > gnubiff-2.2.10 is keyworded ~amd64 as well, so amd64 should do it as well. > > > > For this bug and the other 2 bugs that you commented on (bug 245571 & bug > 245859). I didn't add amd64 because there is no previous stable keyword. I > assume that you are *requesting* stable keywords on all so that we are not > wasting our time that can be better used elsewhere? Sorry, didn't realize that, my fault :( Was just looking through the list of blockers of bug 245160 and was wondering whether this were forgotten. I don't use these so I don't want to request stabilization. Just go ahead as you please. Looking forward to stable gcc-4.3. Keep up your good work and thanks for pointing me to the reason I failed to see myself, darkside. amd64/x86 stable, all arches done. |