| Summary: | dev-util/fuzz: CC variable not respected | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | agorf, jlec |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 243502 | ||
| Attachments: | Patch to ebuild to fix CC issue | ||
Created attachment 194070 [details, diff]
Patch to ebuild to fix CC issue
This package is based on autotools, but ships a configure so old that passing --host= does not cause it to use a fully qualified gcc name. Rerunning autoconf after unpacking updates to a newer configure, which then uses a fully qualified gcc name.
+ 20 Apr 2011; Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org> fuzz-0.6.ebuild: + Respect CC, #244004 + |
I'm filing this bug (from a template, mind you) because the ebuild I'm reporting it against failed to build once I removed my /usr/bin/{gcc,cc,c++,c99} binaries. This means that the ebuild is relying on gcc or cc as compiler, while it should use "$(tc-getCC)" so that user choices are respected, and cross-compiling works as intended. This usually comes down to one of these tasks: - use emake CC="$(tc-getCC)" for building, to ovewrite make's CC variable (defaults to "cc", some upstream rewrites it); - the above plus replacing explicit "gcc" (or similar) calls with $(CC) so that the variable is actually respected; - tc-export CC in src_compile before eventual econf. For C++, you'd have to replace CC with CXX everywhere above, of course. If your package is a special case on this, please let me know. Thanks, Diego