Bug 239929 – app-editors/jove: CFLAGS are ignored

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

[Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2008-10-05 11:36:11 UTC]

I don't know the build system for this program (and this is a generic bug template so I cannot tell you which program exactly is), but my tests shows that it's not respecting CFLAGS properly.

Please look into it, since it's important to respect user CFLAGS.

Thanks,
Diego

[Comment 1 Ulrich Müller 2008-10-05 11:44:18 UTC]

Great, I just committed a new version as fix for bug 239869 one minute ago. :-(

Couldn't you have reported these two build system issues in one single bug, to avoid duplicate work for package maintainers?

[Comment 2 Ulrich Müller 2008-10-05 11:45:22 UTC]

Patches are welcome. :p

[Comment 3 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2008-10-05 11:46:58 UTC]

I was going through the whole list of app-editors/*, but since I grep the logs for one condition first and the other after, they get reported separately... sorry but you're the _only_ person who ever responded to a bug I've been reporting so quickly...

[Comment 4 Ulrich Müller 2008-10-05 11:58:10 UTC]

Hm, src_unpack does:
    sed -i -e "s:^OPTFLAGS =.*:OPTFLAGS = ${CFLAGS}:" Makefile

And my CFLAGS are respected during compilation:
>>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/app-editors/jove-4.16.0.70.3/work/jove4.16.0.70 ...
gcc -O -march=pentium-m -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -DBSDPOSIX_STDC   -c -o commands.o commands.c
gcc -O -march=pentium-m -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -DBSDPOSIX_STDC   -c setmaps.c
[...]

So what exactly is the issue?

[Comment 5 Ulrich Müller 2008-10-21 21:53:34 UTC]

Closing (as discussed on IRC). Maybe the ebuild is not using the most elegant solution, but CFLAGS are respected.