Bug 238694 (gtk2.14-compat)

Summary:	[TRACKER] x11-libs/gtk+-2.14.3 && dev-libs/glib-2.18.1 breakage
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) <remi>
Component:	[OLD] GNOME	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team <gnome>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	magowiz, pacho
Priority:	High	Keywords:	Tracker
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	226405, 231823, 233870, 238698, 238734, 238737, 238837, 238872, 238874, 247707
Bug Blocks:	238650, 253934

Description Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-09-25 21:09:25 UTC

Tracker bug for build breakage induced by gtk+ 2.14 (required for Gnome 2.24)

Comment 1 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev

2008-09-28 05:03:57 UTC

When it's first pass stabilization time, at least >=dev-util/intltool-0.40.4 and >=gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.24.0 need to go stable at the same time as well. libgnomeui just removes the filechooser backend modules (and gtk3 compatibility preparations), because the semi-private GtkFileSystem API doesn't exist anymore in this form - has to go stable at the same time primarily because libgnomeui-2.22 doesn't build anymore due to no GtkFileSystem.
intltool-0.40 is just a dep of new libgnomeui

Comment 2 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev

2008-09-28 18:49:06 UTC

gtk+-2.14 is now unmasked. Hopefully not too many additional broken packages turn up :P

Comment 3 Serkan Kaba (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-10-05 11:26:54 UTC

Please consider dev-java/java-gnome-4.0.7-r2 in stabilization list because the current stable (4.0.7) has a crasher bug with 2.14 which is fixed in this revision.

Comment 4 Hans de Graaff gentoo-dev

2008-10-26 14:14:36 UTC

I've just filed #244471 to stabilize ruby-gtk2+-0.16.0-r4.

Comment 5 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2008-12-15 12:31:29 UTC

Current stable gnome-sharp (and related) 2.16 won't work with gtk+-2.14, then. maybe all new gnome/gtk-sharp stuff will need to be stabilized with new gtk+/glib (I can open a separate bug report for gnome-sharp not compiling if you want)

Comment 6 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev

2009-01-07 02:14:56 UTC

Yes, please a new bug blocking 253934 as I'm closing this one now, as the known and filed stuff is all fixed.

Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2009-01-07 14:01:18 UTC

(In reply to comment #6)
> Yes, please a new bug blocking 253934 as I'm closing this one now, as the known
> and filed stuff is all fixed.
> 

New gtk-sharp will require mono-2, then, I think that bug 234305 is the one that should block bug 253934 (sorry for the inconvenience if I am wrong)