Summary: | [PATCH]sys-devel/binutils-2.18: previous declaration of 'asprintf_chk' was here | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Magnus Granberg <zorry> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | fauli, gengor, kanelxake |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2008.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00292.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 259417 | ||
Attachments: | Fix for glibc 2.8 and asprintf in libiberty.h |
Description
Magnus Granberg
2008-07-25 21:57:04 UTC
Created attachment 161379 [details, diff]
Fix for glibc 2.8 and asprintf in libiberty.h
It will fix the error: previous declaration of 'asprintf_chk' was here
in >gcc-4.2 and >gdb-6.8 to
more info https://hardened.gentooexperimental.org/secure/ticket/33 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-668885-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-300.html Thanks for the patch sys-devel/binutils-2.18.50.0.8 fix the problem on binutils but it don't have any keywords. Can some one add ~x86 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ? GCC 4.3 and GDB 6.8 still need the patch. Fixed in piepatch 10.1.2 for gcc-4.3-2 binutils-2.19 and gcc-4.3.2 are fixed. does gdb-6.8-r1 need the patch still ? (In reply to comment #6) > binutils-2.19 and gcc-4.3.2 are fixed. does gdb-6.8-r1 need the patch still ? > If you put the fortify spec in gcc.c cpp_unique_options then gcc, binutils and gdb don't need the asprintf patch. vapier, which version of binutils needs to go stable for Glibc 2.8? there is no glibc issue here |