Bug 232100

Summary:	sys-fs/udftools-1.0.0b-r7 - open with O_CREAT in second argument needs 3 arguments
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Magnus Granberg <zorry>
Component:	[OLD] GCC Porting	Assignee:	Daniel Drake (RETIRED) <dsd>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	base-system, esigra, kanelxake, loki_val
Priority:	High
Version:	2008.0
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	259417
Attachments:	Fix for O_CREAT bug in udftools Removed CREATE

Description Magnus Granberg gentoo-dev

2008-07-17 19:01:59 UTC

In function ‘open’,
inlined from ‘setup_dev’ at pktsetup.c:88,
inlined from ‘main’ at pktsetup.c:343:
/usr/include/bits/fcntl2.h:51: error: call to ‘__open_missing_mode’ declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT in second argument needs 3 arguments
make[1]: *** [pktsetup.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/udftools-1.0.0b-r7/work/udftools-1.0.0b3/pktsetup'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
*
* ERROR: sys-fs/udftools-1.0.0b-r7 failed.
Gcc 4.3.1 whit fortify_source=2
https://hardened.gentooexperimental.org/secure/ticket/29

Comment 1 Magnus Granberg gentoo-dev

2008-07-17 19:03:04 UTC

Created attachment 160658 [details, diff]
Fix for O_CREAT bug in udftools

Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-07-17 20:56:02 UTC

Your work is greatly appreciated. However, could you please start each Summary with a full package atom?

Comment 3 Magnus Granberg gentoo-dev

2008-07-17 21:02:22 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> Your work is greatly appreciated. However, could you please start each Summary
> with a full package atom?
> 
okey

Comment 4 Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-10-02 11:48:29 UTC

Does it really need O_CREAT here? I mean, it's a dev file it's trying to open, right?

Comment 5 SpanKY gentoo-dev

2008-10-26 07:00:57 UTC

agreed ... but even if it werent a device file, opening something as O_RDONLY|O_CREAT doesnt make any sense

Magnus: could you update the patch accordingly please ?

Comment 6 Magnus Granberg gentoo-dev

2008-10-30 01:20:28 UTC

Created attachment 170280 [details, diff]
Removed CREATE

Something like that?

Comment 7 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-11-23 19:51:40 UTC

This only seems to happen because of -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=2, so this shouldn't block our gcc-4.3 tracker.

Comment 8 Daniel Drake (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-12-04 21:34:19 UTC

thanks, committed as 1.0.0b-r9