Summary: | [PATCH] add support to mail-client/pinepgp for mail-client/alpine (BUG #176904) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Walter <sahne> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Net-Mail Packages <net-mail+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | sascha_lucas |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | Ebuild patch for mail-client/pinepgp to support alpine |
Description
Daniel Walter
2008-05-28 10:12:10 UTC
Created attachment 154567 [details, diff]
Ebuild patch for mail-client/pinepgp to support alpine
this patch changes the dependencies from mail-client/pine to either pine or alpine
Is topal a replacement for pinepgp? Should pinepgp remain in the tree? (In reply to comment #2) > Is topal a replacement for pinepgp? No. As far as I know, there is no solution to use openpgp/mime with (al)pine, expect topal. all others (fixme) can only do inline-pgp (limitation of (al)pine). but topal uses a special/experimental hack to work around this limitation. > Should pinepgp remain in the tree? So I would say yes, until alpine/topal works without hacks. (In reply to comment #1) > Ebuild patch for mail-client/pinepgp to support alpine > > this patch changes the dependencies from mail-client/pine to either pine or > alpine Applied. Thanks |