Summary: | Missing dep for openoffice-2.4 on amd64 : imagemagick | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Cédric Jeanneret <contact> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | VERIFIED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | AMD64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Cédric Jeanneret
2008-05-19 15:55:14 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 212566 *** I don't see why it's a duplicate of the imagemagick bug, which doesn't mention this dependence story...... it is NOT an imagemagick bug. (In reply to comment #2) > I don't see why it's a duplicate of the imagemagick bug, which doesn't mention > this dependence story...... > it is NOT an imagemagick bug. > Which story? The ebuild does depend on imagemagick. Assuming Jeroen was right with this dupe. Please do only reopen after having a look at the bugs already marked as duplicate there and if so provide your exact error message. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 212566 *** (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I don't see why it's a duplicate of the imagemagick bug, which doesn't mention > > this dependence story...... > > it is NOT an imagemagick bug. > > > > Which story? The ebuild does depend on imagemagick. Assuming Jeroen was right > with this dupe. Please do only reopen after having a look at the bugs already > marked as duplicate there and if so provide your exact error message. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 212566 *** > it was NOT an imagemagick problem....... but seems to be fixed now, as I removed imagemagick and tried to re-emerge OOo. now it install imagemagick. but NO, it was NOT a dup of 212566, as 212566 explain a "convert" error, not a failed dependency in another programme ! (In reply to comment #4) > failed dependency in another programme ! You might want to read the previous comment again, the dependancy on imagemagick *has been present* for a long time. |