| Summary: | request: subpackage system for portage (*-devel, *-doc, *-lib,...) like other distros have | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Michael Kefeder <m.kefeder> |
| Component: | Enhancement/Feature Requests | Assignee: | Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) <carpaski> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | mark |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | 2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Michael Kefeder
2003-06-04 12:44:30 UTC
Check bug 12499 for server / client separation. I really dislike this idea for several reasons: - it will probably double the tree size - I appreciate the fact that I DON'T have to install half a dozen packages to get something installed - it would need a rewrite of many ebuilds to seperate the relevant files - we'd need to change all the dependencies - it will confuse many users I like the idea of a client/server separation based on a USE flag as discussed in bug 12499 but I wouldn't feel much if it got rejected. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12499 *** |