| Summary: | x11-terms/aterm-1.0.1* ewarn statement is somewhat inaccurate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mark Tiefenbruck <mark> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) <darkside> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | maintainer-needed |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Mark Tiefenbruck
2008-05-14 09:41:25 UTC
So, in other words you recommend: "The transparent background will only work if you have the 'real' root wallpaper set. Use esetroot (x11-terms/eterm) or wmsetbg (x11-wm/windowmaker) if you are experiencing problems with transparency in aterm." ? (I'm not familar with the utilities myself) Well, to me, recommending eterm in the aterm ebuild seems a little peculiar. To be honest, I usually recommend feh, since it doesn't come with much extra baggage. Its only purpose is displaying images. On the other hand, since setting background images is not its main purpose, finding the right options in the manual is not very easy, as opposed to esetroot and wmsetbg. I think there's something to be said for including all three. Ok, thanks for your input. Clearly, I am not familiar with the tools but would like to fix something that isn't accurate. How about a more general approach below, would a unfamiliar user gain any benefit with this over the existing message? "The transparent background will only work if you have the 'real' root wallpaper set. Some tools that might help include: esetroot (x11-terms/eterm), wmsetbg (x11-wm/windowmaker), or media-gfx/feh." Yes, that looks good, with one caveat: esetroot should be Esetroot. (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, that looks good, with one caveat: esetroot should be Esetroot. > Thanks for your help! Done. |