Bug 217442

Summary:	Packages failing with dev-java/ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.1
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Petteri Räty (RETIRED) <betelgeuse>
Component:	[OLD] Java	Assignee:	Java team <java>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/JDKStabling
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	217448, 219668, 220223, 220461, 220463, 220467, 220475, 220479, 220481, 220487, 220491, 220495, 220499, 223573, 223575, 223579, 236266, 432160
Bug Blocks:	216689
Attachments:	amd64.txt ppc.txt ppc64.txt x86.txt

Description Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 18:24:09 UTC

You should emerge everything with *=ibm-jdk-bin-1.6 in jdk.conf and check that it's actually used for most packages while emerging. Lists of stable ebuilds can be generated with https://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/java/scripts/find-stable-java-ebuilds will attach ones here too

Comment 1 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 18:29:32 UTC

Hmm. One thing to consider is that 0.1 should be coming and 0.0 is security vulnerable so might want to wait for 0.1.

Comment 2 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 18:58:54 UTC

Created attachment 149495 [details]
amd64.txt

Comment 3 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 18:59:12 UTC

Created attachment 149496 [details]
ppc.txt

Comment 4 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 18:59:26 UTC

Created attachment 149497 [details]
ppc64.txt

Comment 5 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 18:59:40 UTC

Created attachment 149499 [details]
x86.txt

Comment 6 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-12 19:05:20 UTC

Added testings instructions to our wiki https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/JDKStabling

Comment 7 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-04-19 13:26:37 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm. One thing to consider is that 0.1 should be coming and 0.0 is security
> vulnerable so might want to wait for 0.1.

Any idea when 0.1 can be expected? I've let 0.0 work through your ppc.txt list and found no new problems. So it looks good to go for ppc.

Comment 8 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-05-01 23:11:45 UTC

So now we have 1.6.0.1, security fixed.
distfiles as usual (via ssh d.g.o:~caster/tmp)
The question is if we stable now or wait since there was a version bump. Although minor, on amd64 there seem to be larger changes in layout.

Comment 9 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-05-11 15:05:43 UTC

ppc64 stable

Comment 10 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-05-12 10:53:46 UTC

ppc stable

Comment 11 Serkan Kaba (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-06-14 12:40:06 UTC

Revbumped to fix bugs #220461, #220463, #220467, #220479, #220495, #223575.

Comment 12 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-06-16 06:41:40 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 216112 ***

Comment 13 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-06-16 07:17:24 UTC

Sorry for the mess.

Comment 14 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2009-12-20 10:59:03 UTC

  09 Nov 2009; Markus Meier <maekke@gentoo.org> ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.6.ebuild:
  amd64 stable, bug #287490

Comment 15 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-12-29 15:54:39 UTC

We go out of here, as a security vulnerability is handled in bug 287490

Comment 16 James Le Cuirot gentoo-dev

2016-04-14 20:37:15 UTC

ibm-jdk-bin has been last-rited and all dependent bugs are closed.