Summary: | sys-apps/coreutils have wrong depends on g/fbsd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo/Alt | Reporter: | MT <toffanin.mauro> |
Component: | FreeBSD | Assignee: | Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | base-system |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | FreeBSD | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
coreutils-6.10-r1.ebuild.patch
coreutils-6.10-r1.ebuild.patch coreutils-6.9-r1.ebuild.patch |
Description
MT
2008-02-19 10:24:03 UTC
Created attachment 143944 [details, diff]
coreutils-6.10-r1.ebuild.patch
Created attachment 143950 [details, diff]
coreutils-6.10-r1.ebuild.patch
also sys-apps/acl is a wrong dependency for g/fbsd, this new ebuild patch correct both the problems.
Created attachment 143952 [details, diff]
coreutils-6.9-r1.ebuild.patch
also coreutils-6.9 have the same problems; here the ebuild patch for this release.
I would suggest the BSD team close this bug. coreutils will have a lot more issues then acl/attr support since BSD provides the same utilities already so you would get some serious file collisions. kernel_linux?() is the wrong check. these libraries are not specific to linux, nor are they dependent on the kernel. (In reply to Doug Goldstein from comment #4) > I would suggest the BSD team close this bug. coreutils will have a lot more > issues then acl/attr support since BSD provides the same utilities already > so you would get some serious file collisions. +1, we don't really need coreutils on fbsd |